Question 4
(a)
A metal surface is illuminated with light of a single wavelength λ.
On Fig. 10.1, sketch
the variation with λ of
the maximum kinetic energy EMAX of
the electrons emitted from the surface.
On your graph mark,
with the symbol λ0,
the threshold wavelength.
Fig. 10.1
[3]
(b)
A neutron is moving in a straight line with momentum p.
The de Broglie
wavelength associated with this neutron is λ.
On Fig. 10.2, sketch
the variation with momentum p of the de Broglie
wavelength λ.
Fig. 10.2
[2]
[Total: 5]
Reference: Past Exam Paper – November 2017 Paper 42 Q10
Solution:
(a)
λ0 marked and graph line
passing through EMAX = 0 at λ = λ0
graph line with λ always < λ0
negative gradient with correct concave
curvature
{Energy of
photon: E = hf = hc / λ
Energy from
photon = Work function + KE
Energy is
required for the electrons to break free from the metal. The remaining energy
goes as kinetic energy.
The minimum
energy required to liberate an electron is called the work function which
occurs at a threshold frequency f0 and corresponding threshold
wavelength λ0 (this is the max wavelength for emission.
Photons of greater wavelength will not cause emission).
If the energy of the
photon is equal to the work function, no energy goes as KE.
→ So, when λ = λ0,
EMAX = 0.
The threshold
wavelength λ0 is the maximum wavelength for photoemission.
Photons of greater wavelength will not cause emission).
→ So, the line is
always in the region < λ0.
Energy of
photon: E = hf = hc / λ
KE or EMAX =
Energy of photon – Work function
OR EMAX = hc / λ (– Work function)
The EMAX
is inversely proportional to λ. The graph is that of an inverse
relationship, having a negative gradient.}
(b)
curve with negative gradient and correct
concave curvature
not
touching either axis
The de Broglie wavelength and the
momentum are related by the equation:
λ = h / p
This is an inverse
relationship graph. The graph does not touch either axis.
why does the graph for De Broglie wavelength and momentum not touch either axis? also in the first graph for Emax and wavelength why does the curve not touch the energy (y) axis
ReplyDeletedue to the inverse relationship.
DeleteIf wavelength is zero, the momentum would be infinite - but this does not exist.
Also, if the wavelength is zero, it means that it does not actually exist.
The same applies for the first graph.
Why do we need to show a curve in the wavelength against momentum graph? Why can’t we just draw a straight line with a negative gradient?
ReplyDeleteAs explained above, formula relating Emax and λ is
DeleteEmax = (hc/λ) – Work function
For an equation to be a straight line, it sould follow the equation y = mx + c
The above equation does not follow the equation of a straight line. Instead, it follows
y = 1/x
Emax = hc / λ (– Work function)
So graph should have a shape similar to a graph of y = 1/x
If the axes were Emax against (1/λ), then a straight line would have been obtained.
A straight line with negative wavelength would be of the form:
y = -mx + c