FOLLOW US ON TWITTER
SHARE THIS PAGE ON FACEBOOK, TWITTER, WHATSAPP ... USING THE BUTTONS ON THE LEFT


YOUR PARTICIPATION FOR THE GROWTH OF PHYSICS REFERENCE BLOG

Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Complex Analysis: #14 Isolated Singularities

  • Complex Analysis: #14 Isolated Singularities

A “singularity” is really nothing more than a point of the complex plane where a given function is not defined. That is, if f is defined in a region G ⊂ ℂ, then any point a ∉ G can be thought of as being a singularity of the function. But this is not really what we are thinking about when we speak of singularities. As an example of what we are thinking about, consider the particular function

Complex Analysis: #14 Isolated Singularities equation pic 1

Here, except for the special point z0 = 0 which is not so nice, we have a good example of an analytic function. Since only a single point is causing problems with this function, let us more or less ignore this point and call it an isolated singularity. So in general, an isolated singularity is a point z0 ∈ ℂ such that z0 ∉ G, yet there exists some r > 0 with B(z0, r) \ {z0} ⊂ G.

Definition 11
Let f : G → ℂ be analytic, but with an isolated singularity at z0 ∈ ℂ. The residue of f at z0 is the number

Complex Analysis: #14 Isolated Singularities equation pic 2

According to Cauchy’s theorem, the residue is a well-defined number, independent of the radius r of the circle of the path used to define it, as long as r is small enough to satisfy our condition.

We identify three different kinds of isolated singularities:
  • removable singularities, 
  • poles,
  • essential singularities. 
Let’s begin with removable singularities. Let f : G → ℂ have a singularity at z0. This singularity is removable if it is possible to find some number w0 such that if we simply define f0 : G ∪ {z0} → ℂ by

Complex Analysis: #14 Isolated Singularities equation pic 3

then f0 is analytic (thus also differentiable at the special point z0). We see then that a removable singularity is really nothing special. We have simply “forgotten” to put in the correct value of the function f at the isolated point z0. By putting in the correct value, the singularity disappears.

A pole is somewhat more interesting. For example the function

Complex Analysis: #14 Isolated Singularities equation pic 4

has a “simple” pole at the point z0 = 0. But then if we multiply f with the “simple” polynomial g(z) = z, then we get f(z) · g(z) = 1. Of course the function f · g has a removable singularity at the special point z0 = 0. Furthermore, the function which results does not have a zero at the point 0. The general rule is: let z0 be an isolated, not removable, singularity of the analytic function f. If there is some n ∈ ℕ such that the function given by f(z) · (z − z0)n has a removable singularity at z0, and the resulting function does not have a zero at z0, then z0 is a pole of order n.

Finally, an essential singularity is neither removable, nor is it a pole.

Definition 12
Let f : G → ℂ be analytic, such that all it’s isolated singularities are either removable or else they are poles. Then f is called a meromorphic function (defined in G).

No comments:

Post a Comment

If it's a past exam question, do not include links to the paper. Only the reference.
Comments will only be published after moderation

Currently Viewing: Physics Reference | Complex Analysis: #14 Isolated Singularities